sexy Midnight Oil short set

These are sexy, comfortable and easy to wear…and can keep up with you all night!

  • $25.00
  • Sizes XL/2XL
  • Nylon/lycra
  • Hand wash, hang to dry
  • large photo large photo
  • Found at http://sizequeenclothing.com/
  • Leave comments on what you think.

    I feel it will be thick girls who advance the fat acceptance movement in the biggest way.

    Chloe Marshal who was the first plus sized woman to compete in the miss england pagent.

    This seems more common sense than anything or atleast observation, it seems many of us big girls crave to see big women in the spotlight. I was reading a post on Chloe Marshal

    And it struck me, most of the women role promote fat acceptance in a big way are plumpers. thats right though the most vocal tend to be bbw’s and ssbbws but its the plumpers that actually make progress. delta burk, Chloe Marshal, America Ferrera, Kirstie Alley etc etc…. all plumpers .

    I find that interesting because I have been told by women in the FA movement that smaller bbws cant understand or help the cause but here I am looking at story after story of plumpers making the biggest difference in america’s perception of size vs beauty.

    My ex boyfriend ( bbwpimp from ThickTopia)compared it to the light vs dark skinned black thing.

    on how lighter skinned blacks gained acceptance first making the way for their darker skinned brethren  I feel  plumpers  are  the fa equivalent of light skinned blacks, and the FA movement is where the civil rights movment was in the 50’s.

    america ferrera is to FA today what lena horne was to civil rights in the 40’s not that lena did any marching

    Lena Horne the first really big african american star way back in the 40s

    Lena Horne the first really big african american star way back in the 40's

    America Ferrera Star of ugly betty, award winning actress and plumper( you go girl!!!)

    America Ferrera Star of ugly betty, award winning actress and plumper( you go girl!!!)

    but she did add acceptability to the african american community in the eyes of the general population at large. I imagine many guys back in the 40’s saying ” that lena horne is hot for a colored gal” and I also imagine some viewers of the miss englan pagent saying ” that Chloe Marshal is hot for a fat chick” yes that is offensive in and of itself but it is a step toward acceptance.

    Disfigured

    I love Netflix, because not only does it make watching movies possible for me, as a mom to a toddler, but I can get just about any film/TV show I want. I just finished watching Disfigured, a film about a fat woman who belongs to an FA group, still struggling with self acceptance, who befriends a recovering anorexic. For those of you with a history of ED, the film does have several scenes which may be triggering. Although the film was a bit on the shallow end, in terms of the story, the characters were really well developed. Lydia, wasn’t just a caricature of a fat woman, she was a whole person, something which you rarely find in film or TV. It’s also extremely unusual to have a fat character as a lead, especially since she doesn’t miraculously lose weight by the end of the film.

    One of the most powerful scenes in the movie was the sex scene between Lydia and Bob. This was a real sex scene, two people, naked, having sex. I have never seen a sex scene involving one fat person, let alone two, in which the characters were not portrayed as ridiculous, hideous, over sexed, or just freaky. I have never seen a woman, who looks like me, as a romantic interest, let alone naked on screen. I could get some BBW porn I suppose, but that is not a portrayal of a “normal” woman, it’s a portrayal of a fetish. This was a regular movie, about regular people, who happened to be fat, and also happened to have sex.In your typical Hollywood movies, fat characters are often played by thin people in fat suits. These characters exist for one of two reasons, either to show their miraculous and wonderful transformation into thin people (i.e. socially acceptable heroes), or for comic relief (i.e. look at how much that fat person eats, look at the fat person farting, look at the over sexed fat person, and that’s just in Eddie Murphy movies). That was not the case in this film.

    This was not my favorite film, it could have been more in depth, and portrayed anorexia more realistically, but overall it was really good. It would be great to see more movies with fat characters who are just regular people. I’m not sure how likely that is, but we can voice our opinions with our money. If you go to see a movie in which a “fat” person is portrayed as a caricature, only to be mocked, or be accepted only after losing weight, then you are supporting a culture in which all of us “real” fat people are also mocked, and expected to lose weight in order to be acceptable. Fat people are PEOPLE. Disfigured portrayed Lydia as a person, in our obesity-hysteria filled culture that is unusual and commendable.

    A lovely swimsuit

    This lovely swimwear.

    This simple yet elegant new tankini from Christina is unlike any other. Don’t be fooled by the thin straps – this plus size swimsuit still offers great support with a wide elastic band in the front and back! The straps also feature white trim to match the design on the top.

    • Soft-cup bra with 1 1/4 inch wide elastic band in front and back for extra support
    • Flattering V-neck design
    • Adjustable straps with metal sliders for custom fit
    • Straight-lined back
    • Length of top 14″ from underarm to hemline
    • Made from chlorine resistant fabric to reduce fading
    • 80% Nylon 20% Spandex.
    • Color: Black/White
    • Hand Wash. Imported
    • Ladie’s Portrait 2pc Sweetheart Camisole Plus Size Swimsuit
      Item # CHWA52600
      Regular price: $88.00
      Sale price: $69.00
    • Ifound this at http://www.swimsuitsjustforus.com

    The Burdens of Being Overweight: Mistreatment and Misconceptions

    Aleta Walker never had any friends during her childhood and adolescence in Hannibal, Mo. Instead, she was ridiculed and bullied every day. When she walked down the halls at school, boys would flatten themselves against the lockers and cry, “Wide load!” But the worst was lunchtime, she said.

    “Every day there was this production of watching me eat lunch,” Ms. Walker said. She tried to avoid going to the school cafeteria. “I would hide out in the bathroom. I would hide out behind the gym by the baseball diamond. I would hide in the library.”

    One day, schoolmates started throwing food at her as she sat at a table at lunch. Plates of spaghetti splashed onto her face, and the long greasy strands dripped onto her clothes. “Everyone was laughing and pointing. They were making pig noises. I just sat there,” she said. Surrounded by Abuse

    Ms. Walker is fat. And, like most fat people, she has been dogged by ridicule and abuse throughout her life. She has felt discrimination on the job. She is constantly subjected to rude remarks and ugly noises, like pig grunts or moos, when she goes out, and she has had a hard time making friends.

    Despite the consistent findings by obesity researchers that most people actually have little control over their body weight, researchers find and fat people confirm that society continues to deride fat people for their condition.

    Studies have found that fat people are less likely to be admitted to elite colleges, are less likely to be hired for a job, make less money when they are hired, and are less likely to be promoted. One study found that businessmen sacrifice $1,000 in salary for every pound they are overweight. Fat people tell researchers that they are accosted on the street by strangers who admonish them to lose weight. Often, their own children are ashamed of them. Studies have shown that even many doctors find fat people disgusting, and some refuse to treat them. They’d Rather Be Blind

    In a recent study of formerly fat people who had lost weight after intestinal bypass surgery, researchers at the University of Florida reported that virtually all said they would rather be blind or deaf or have a leg amputated than be fat again.

    “Overweight people have a condition that is unacceptable in our society,” said Dr. Kelly Brownell, an obesity researcher at Yale University School of Medicine. And, he added, unlike the blind or the deaf, fat people are told that they could be thin if they really wanted to. “It’s kind of a double punishment,” Dr. Brownell said.

    Dr. Albert Stunkard, an obesity researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, agreed. “There’s that implicit assumption that you really could lose weight if you settled down and stopped being such a fat slob,” he said.

    Fat people are the last group that it is acceptable to discriminate against blatantly, said Dr. Esther Rothblum, a psychologist at the University of Vermont who studies the social consequences of being fat. Sally E. Smith, the executive director of the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance, an advocacy group in Sacramento, Calif., said Michigan is the only state that prohibits discrimination against fat people. Ms. Smith added that fat people have sued employers and sometimes won on the basis of discrimination against the handicapped but not on the basis of discrimination against the obese. Desperate Fight Against Weight

    An estimated 25 to 30 percent of Americans are obese, defined as 25 percent or more above their ideal weight. Most have tried and tried again to reduce. Often the fatter they are, the more desperately they tried.

    Tyranny of the slender?

    Unashamed of their size, fed up with fat jokes, and angry at the national obsession with dieting, overweight activists are mounting a feisty protest movement against the medical establishment’s campaign against obesity.

    “We’re living in the middle of a witch hunt and fat people are the witches,” said Marilyn Wann of San Francisco, a militant member of the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance. “It’s gotten markedly worse in the last few years because of the propaganda that fatness, a natural human characteristic, is somehow a form of disease.”

    The association, known as NAAFA, holds its annual convention starting Wednesday in Newark, N.J., bringing together activists for social events and workshops on self-acceptance, political advocacy and the “fat liberation” movement.

    “I hope we can be a viable force of sanity in the midst of hysteria,” said NAAFA spokeswoman Mary Ray Worley of Madison, Wis. “I’ve found allies in all kinds of unexpected places, but overall there’s a lot of animosity. Some people act like obesity is the next worst thing after terrorism.”

    The convention comes as the movement is scrambling to counter federal government pronouncements that obesity is a “critical public health problem” costing more than $100 billion and 300,000 lives per year.

    Jeannie Moloo, an American Dietetic Association spokeswoman who counsels overweight clients at her nutrition practice in Sacramento, Calif., empathizes with the activists’ fight against bias, but says they should be wary of oversimplifying obesity-related health issues.

    “Some people can be overweight all their lives and not end up with diabetes or heart disease or hypertension,” Moloo said. “But the majority are probably going to develop one of these life-altering conditions.”

    ‘Obesity is not a disease’
    Fat-acceptance groups were dismayed when federal officials announced last month that Medicare was discarding its declaration that obesity isn’t a disease. The policy change will likely prompt overweight Americans covered by Medicare to file medical claims for treatments such as stomach surgery and diet programs.

    “Obesity is not a disease,” insisted Allen Steadham, director of the Austin, Texas-based International Size Acceptance Association. “All this does is open the door for the diet and bariatric surgery industries to make a potentially tremendous profit.”

    Most fat-acceptance activists endorse the concept of eating healthy food and exercising regularly, but they oppose any fixation on losing weight and contend that more than 95 percent of diets fail. They also decry the rapid growth of stomach-shrinking surgery; the number of such procedures has quadrupled to 100,000 annually since 1998.

    Wann depicts bariatric surgery as “stomach amputation” that imposes anorexia on patients and exposes them to long-term risks. Kelly Bliss, a self-described “full-figured fitness instructor” from Lansdowne, Pa., predicts that future generations will disapprovingly look back on stomach surgery as “comparable to lobotomies.”

    Bliss, who coaches clients by phone and in fitness classes, subscribes to a philosophy called “health at every size” — preaching that health, fitness and self-esteem can be achieved independent of weight.

    “There’s a war on obese people, and I’m treating the casualties — people whose hearts are being ripped out,” Bliss said.

    Discrimination cases
    NAAFA and others have tried to combat what they see as rampant discrimination against fat people, but progress has been sporadic. Southwest Airlines, for example, resisted protests targeting its policy of requiring large passengers to purchase a second ticket if they can’t fit in a single seat.

    “People want to fight for their rights, but there’s a lot of shame involved,” Steadham said. “It takes a whole lot of determination to stick through it to the end.”

    A few cities, including San Francisco, explicitly outlaw weight discrimination. Michigan is the only state to do so, but its Civil Rights Department said only five of 1,696 job discrimination complaints filed in 2003 involved weight.

    Walter Lindstrom, a San Diego attorney specializing in weight-discrimination cases, said overweight plaintiffs usually must prove that acts of bias against them are covered by federal laws prohibiting discrimination against disabled people.

    “These cases are more difficult from a proof standpoint, and also because you’re dealing with a very unpopular class of clients,” Lindstrom said. “Juries are generally disgusted with your average size-related plaintiff. You have to get past that, and have them see the plaintiff as someone with a true medical problem.”

    Many fat-acceptance activists were heartened by this year’s publication of “The Obesity Myth” by University of Colorado law professor Paul Campos, who contends that diet promoters, drug companies and weight-loss surgeons have whipped up an irrational panic over weight.

    Campos shares many of the activists’ views but says their effectiveness has been limited.

    “The movement has found itself marginalized by drawing its membership and leadership from the far extreme of obesity,” he said. “It will be more successful if it can attract the two-thirds of Americans who are being told by the government that they weigh too much _ the I-want-to-lose-20-pounds crowd who are starting to feel a certain amount of resentment from the constant haranguing they’re getting.”

    Walkin’ all ovah you Skirt

    For shoe-a-holics only…this colorful skirt has it all. Pockets, comfortable elastic waist, and a sexy snapped (or unsnapped) back slit.

  • $60.00
  • 2/3XL, Waist 38″ to 44″, Hips to 54″, Front length 27″, Back Length 28″
  • 100% Cotton
  • Machine wash cold, dry cool or hang to dry
  • large photo large photo
  • Found at http://sizequeenclothing.com/
  • sexy naughty wear for the big girl

    Women's Plus Size Lingerie - Sexy Eyelet Molded Cup Babydoll Set - Sizes 1X-3X - Style# 3017

    sexy undies that actually look good on us thick girls.

    Sensual and sexy. This eyelet galloon lace molded cup babydoll is a perfect addition to your lingerie wardrobe! Slenderizes your waist and hips with its mesh flyaway material. Also, offers extra support with lace molded underwire cups, hook and eye closure and adjustable straps. Lace g-string is included. Look and feel sexy for any occasion!

    FEATURES:
    ♥ Bust Enhancer
    ♥ Waist Minimizer
    ♥ Hip Minimizer
    ♥ Lace Molded Underwire Cups
    ♥ Adjustable Straps
    ♥ G-String Included

    Sizes: 1X, 2X, 3X
    Color: Black and Pink

    Found at http://www.alwaysforme.com

    Weight Issues in “The King of Queens”

    The King of Queens was a sitcom about Doug and Carrie Heffernan, an ordinary couple with a less-than-glamorous life. Doug (Kevin James) is fat, while Carrie (Leah Remini) is thin. The weight wasn’t the main point of the show, but it was often played for laughs, and it was dealt with in some episodes.

    Lots of people consider this show to be fat positive, mainly for the following reasons:
    a) Doug is the protagonist, the loveable everyman character;
    and
    b) he has a hot wife.

    I think both points are somewhat problematic. Yes, Doug is a loveable character, but he’s a loveable loser, an everyman slob with no education, a low-income job and (sometimes) poor manners. This is how fat men are often depicted on TV. The fact that he’s a protagonist is not fat positive per se, because fat men aren’t as big a taboo on TV as fat women. Lots of shows depict fat men as the everyman archetype – famous examples include Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin on Family Guy. Are we supposed to identify with them? Often, yes. Are we supposed to see them as ideals or acceptable models for behavior? Mostly not. While Doug isn’t as dumb as Homer or as obnoxious as Peter, he’s frequently depicted as selfish, careless and sexist.

    Also, just like Homer Simpson, he’s shown eating all the time. I definitely think his weight is supposed to be one of his loveable flaws. “Fat is a loveable flaw”, while more positive than “fat kills” or “fat means you’re a bad person”, is still not very positive. There’s still the “flaw” part. Even if eating lots of fatty meat (among other things) is more socially acceptable for a man than for a woman, it’s still viewed as greed by many people, and the show definitely doesn’t do much to dispel that idea. For example, in an episode, Doug is unwilling to share his chocolate bar. Then there’s the fact that Doug is often shown dieting, and at one point, the actor lost some weight and they wrote that into the show as an obvious source of pride. Doug was even admired by ladies more after his diet. The initiator of Doug’s diets is almost always his “hot” wife Carrie. This is par for the course in sitcom land: fat people don’t go on diets, they are put on diets by doctors or loved ones.

    In an episode, Carrie puts Doug on a diet, and Doug finds she nags less about it if he gets her drunk. So he starts getting her drunk every night (yeah, it’s a sitcom). When Carrie finds out he’s been doing this, she gets furious. He says he loves her the way she is, only more when she’s drunk. Hurt, Carrie says, “I love you the way you are, too. Fat, really fat, five pounds lighter but still too fat…” This doesn’t sound particularly caring, and even if it’s said in anger with the obvious intent of hurting him, it shows an underlying negative attitude about his weight. Doug tells her it hurts that she wants him to diet. Carrie says she does it because she wants him to live to be 40. Doug says, in an inflated voice, “Well it still hurts!” The audience laughs.

    We’re supposed to think that it’s just love, taking care of him, but you know what? It often does hurt. She doesn’t win the argument with the “fat people die young” cliché, because it’s extremely rare for anyone to die before 40 simply because they’re fat. While Doug is big, he’s not big enough to be unable to function, and he doesn’t seem to have any health problems. And then there’s her previous comment about how fat he is, which might not invalidate the caring part, but makes me ask whether caring is the only reason she makes him diet. What’s even more revealing is that in another episode, Carrie encourages Doug to work out harder after looking at a photo of him as a young athlete.

    In a later episode, Carrie tells Doug he has a food addiction and takes him into counseling. This is an example of what I’d call caring. I’m not sure what to think of the implication that Doug’s an emotional eater, however. This show likes to keep its themes light, and no real explanation is given for Doug’s eating. He does get it “in control” for a while and loses some weight, but it seems like they dropped the ball on that storyline later on. It’s not necessarily a bad development that he eats somewhat healthier, but I think the writers should have made up their minds. Either he’s an emotional eater who needs to get it in control before he dies young, or he’s just a happy-go-lucky guy who loves eating and should stay the way he is. I feel like the writers used whichever worked for the episode (true of many things on this show), and it leads to a pretty ambivalent threatment of the character’s food issues.

    The portrayal of Carrie also annoys me. I have noticed a tendency in sitcoms to make the wife the “conscience” or the reasonable person, while the husband is the man-child who wants to be free – eat whatever he wants, drink beer, watch TV, be a slob and what have you. I’m not really sure which is the positive portrayal, as viewers tend to identify with the man-child more than the wife. There also seems to be a tendency to begin the show with more equal roles and end it with the wife as the dull yet reasonable one who’s always making remarks about the husband’s lifestyle. While Carrie isn’t as nagging as, say, Debra on Everybody Loves Raymond, she often seems nagging and despising of Doug’s weight and eating in particular.

    Then there’s the “hot wife” aspect. There are many problems with this. Are fat women the consolation prize? If Doug had a not-so-hot wife, would he be “settling” because he can’t have anyone “better”? Is a show with a fat husband and fat wife – Roseanne or… are there any others? – less empowering for fat people than a show like this? Why are there fewer stories where the woman is fat and the man is thin? The wife in any given TV show or movie will be younger, thinner, more trendy and more looks-conscious than her husband.

    There are those who complain about the “unrealistic” portrayal of fat man/hot wife. “Why would she ever want to be with a slob like Doug?” I don’t know where these people live, but I’ve seen lots of couples like this – and even (gasp!) fat woman and slim man couples – in real life. These comments make me wonder if it isn’t a fat positive portrayal after all (a hot woman can love a fat man). But given the sexism of “Carrie’s body=Doug’s manhood”, as well as the aspect of Carrie constantly wanting Doug to be thinner (which might imply that Carrie is “settling”), I can’t really give it a pass.

    What’s worse, Doug’s worth as a man seems to be constructed through Carrie’s hotness. When he goes to a class reunion, he wants to show her off as his only achievement. Interestingly, Doug first tries to lose weight, but failing at that, he knows Carrie will be his trump card and people will still consider him something of a success. Doug’s body is seen as a kind of failure, while Carrie’s body is a cause of pride, not only for herself, but also for Doug.

    There was an unexpected change in the fat husband/hot wife dynamic when Leah Remini got pregnant. For some reason, the writers didn’t want Carrie to be pregnant, so they went with the old hiding trick of sitcoms. Carrie suddenly took to wearing surprisingly loose garments. Viewers complained, as usual, about the obvious baby pouch. This has never been a very good way of hiding an actor’s pregnancy. However, something unexpected happened: Remini kept a lot of weight on after she gave birth. Now Carrie was permanently chubbier for no reason. The writers decided it was time to address this.

    Doug tells Carrie that he thinks she’s getting chubby. As Carrie points out, Doug has been fat throughout their marriage, but Doug thinks there’s a difference: he was always fat, while Carrie’s weight has changed. Her reaction to this is getting a personal trainer for them both. But alas, Doug cheats on his lessons, because it’s Carrie who has to lose weight and not him. I haven’t seen this episode, so I’m not sure how the conflict is resolved when Carrie eventually finds out. But it bugs, a lot.

    Doug might as well say what he’s thinking: it’s ok for the man to be fat, even gain a lot of weight, but not for the woman. “Let’s both diet” is not necessarily the compromise it sounds like. I’ll admit that Carrie pressurizing Doug to go on a diet isn’t very positive either, and some might see this as a “tables have turned” moment. Interestingly, both seem to see the other’s body as shared property and lay some claim on its shape and size. However, this episode shows that Carrie sees her body as Doug’s property to some extent, while Doug doesn’t see his body as Carrie’s property.

    My watching of the show was sporadic, so I’m sure these are only some of the examples of the disturbingly ambivalent weight issues on the show. If you know of more, feel free to analyze them in the comments.

    Negative Compliments

    Very often, when people say something good about a fat woman, it’s not a simple positive compliment like “You look really good today.” We all know the aggravating “You have such a pretty face” and “Have you lost weight?” variants, but there’s also another type of negative compliment. It’s the “at least you’re better than” compliment. “You’re much better off being fat than anorexic”, or “You look much better than those skinny bitches”. It’s a compliment that directly offends someone else. The fat woman’s positivity, especially looks-wise, is constructed through something she’s not, the other extreme she’s been able to avoid.

    This is especially true of fat actors. I was looking through Camryn Manheim’s imdb bio and made the mistake of reading some of her forum below. People are complimenting her appearance in this thread, but it seems to be combined with anger against thin actresses:

    “I’d like to see a movie where Johnny Depp tells Kirsten Dunst “It won’t work out, you’re just too darn skinny!”

    My jaw dropped when I saw this. Some people want to see a movie where a man dumps a woman based on her appearance. But hey, it’s cool because she’s unattainably skinny. If a man dumps a skinny woman, he does it for ALL women. He’s not offending women who are naturally skinny, because everyone is naturally the same – on the slim end of normalweight – if they eat right and exercise. So really, he’s not rejecting the woman inside, but the symbol of having to be skinny to be attractive to men. It might sound good, but this is the kind of logic that we should be trying to avoid. No body should be made into a symbol.

    Some people see skinny the same way they see fat. It’s unhealthy, it’s a sign of having an eating disorder, it’s the symbol of abiding to ideals instead of being yourself, it’s not being real. This is not empowering or accepting in any way, because it’s still making generalizations based on people’s appearance and aggrandizing normalweight as the only real body people can have. In my experience, the people who make fun of “stick insects” are the same people who laugh at fatties. They will try to flatter you by saying they find skinny women ugly.

    I don’t think it’s fat acceptant at all to go around saying you’d rather see a fat actress than a “stick insect”, “skeleton”, or “anorexic”. These are all terrible words (except “anorexic” when applied to people with actual anorexia). Some women are naturally that way and should have the right to be seen as normal variants, not as extreme examples of dieting. Some skinny women love eating. Some skinny women are fat acceptant. Most skinny women are far from being bitches.

    The negative compliment is really a double negative, because it goes against fat women too. The underlying idea is that fat is sort of a bad thing. Better than some other things, but still inherently bad. Why is it that we never hear fat women compared favorably to “normalweight” ones? Some people do prefer fat women to normalweight women; it’s only a matter of taste. However, they’re usually shot down with “But it’s unhealthy to be fat!” as if sexual tastes have anything to do with health.

    Predictably, someone in the thread asks, “Is this a thread for fat fetishists”? Remember, if you like a fat woman’s appearance, you like fat; if you like a thin woman’s appearance, you like women, or the individual woman. It’s ironic, because lots of men fetishize thin women and their disciplined, obedient bodies. This is often not a conscious thing and they are not called on it, so they assume their fetish is just regular heterosexual lust, or even something better – unusually high standards: “I like a really beautiful woman.”

    As a lesbian, I find many thin women attractive. I also find many fat women attractive. It doesn’t seem to have that much to do with weight; it’s more about the looks of each individual. I used to try and like exclusively fat women, because it’s not fat acceptant to like thin women and everyone already likes them anyway. But then I realized three things:

    1) fat acceptance has nothing to do with physical attraction;

    2) everyone does not like thin women. There are lots of people who find both fat and thin
    repulsive, and are proud to proclaim this;

    3) shock horror – thin women have body insecurities too.

    So really, it hurts people when we say, “This woman is a stick insect”, or “I find people this skinny repulsive”. It’s never fun to hear that you, or people your size, are repulsive. You don’t have to find everyone attractive, but it shows poor judgement and lack of empathy to go around saying people are ugly or repulsive. And in this digital era, you can be sure that stars sometimes read conversations about themselves online. Why do we expect them to have egos of steel that aren’t affected by such comments?

    “I’d rather see a fat woman than a skinny one” is a straw man. It expresses the attitude that fat is bad, but skinny is even worse. It’s a misguided way to rebel against beauty ideals. It changes nothing. One woman is still called beautiful at the expense of another; the ideal is reversed to be anti-skinny, but it’s still exclusive. Here’s a revolutionary idea: if you find someone beautiful, why not just call her beautiful?